Efficacy and Feasibility of BurstDR SCS in Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Description

This investigator-initiated, post-market clinical study is designed to evaluate the efficacy, feasibility, and safety of BurstDR spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for the management of painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN) using Abbott’s Proclaim XR and Eterna implantable pulse generator systems. The SCS systems used in this study are FDA-approved for PDN, and all clinical procedures-including the percutaneous trial phase and permanent implantation-are performed according to standard-of-care practice by experienced clinicians.

Eligible participants are adults aged 19 years or older with confirmed diabetic neuropathy (via EMG or skin biopsy), neuropathic pain severity meeting VAS ≥6 and DN4 ≥4, failure of conventional medical therapy, and suitability for SCS treatment. After informed consent, participants will complete baseline assessments followed by a temporary one-week SCS trial with BurstDR stimulation. Participants who experience meaningful pain reduction during the trial will proceed to permanent implantation. Follow-up assessments occur at 1, 3, and 6 months after implantation, during which validated patient-reported outcomes and clinician-reported measures will be collected. Adverse events, device-related complications, therapy discontinuations, and protocol deviations will be monitored and documented.

The study’s primary objective is to determine the proportion of participants achieving ≥50% pain reduction on the Visual Analog Scale at follow-up visits. Secondary objectives evaluate changes in diabetes-related quality of life (DQoL), neuropathic symptoms (DN4), sleep interference (PSQ-3), and patient and clinician impression of change. Tertiary objectives assess feasibility parameters including recruitment rates, retention, protocol adherence, and safety outcomes. Data will be captured and stored using a HIPAA-compliant, 21 CFR Part 11-validated Clinical Trial Management System. The study is conducted at TriCity Research Center with IRB oversight and is funded by Abbott, which has no role in study design, data analysis, or publication decisions.