Endotype DIrected Treatment for OSA in Down Syndrome

Description

Background and Significance: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the most common comorbidities present in individuals with Down syndrome. In children without Down syndrome, OSA has a prevalence of 2-5%2 whereas the prevalence of OSA in children with Down syndrome has been estimated at 50-79%. Similarly, OSA occurs in 12% of adults without Down syndrome, but occurs in 80-100% of adults with Down syndrome. In studies by our group and others, OSA has been associated with neurocognitive impairment and impaired health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in children and adults with Down syndrome. Cognition and HRQOL have been shown to improve with effective treatment of OSA in people with Down syndrome. However, current treatments for OSA have limited effectiveness in people with Down syndrome. Adenotonsillectomy has been shown to have limited efficacy, as 65-73% of children with Down syndrome have residual OSA after adenotonsillectomy. Similarly, positive airway pressure (PAP) effectiveness is limited by poor adherence. Hypoglossal nerve stimulation has emerged as a new treatment but is an invasive procedure that involves a surgically placed implant that many individuals may prefer to avoid. Additionally, surgical complications are more common in people with DS compared to people without Down syndrome. Use is also limited in younger children with significant growth remaining. Given this, there is a great need for effective alternative therapies. The combination of atomoxetine and oxybutynin (ato-oxy) is a promising alternative therapy but is not effective in all individuals with Down syndrome. Similarly, oxygen therapy is often considered as an alternative treatment for OSA but is not effective in all patients. Underlying physiologic patient characteristics (OSA endotype) have predicted treatment response for OSA with both ato-oxy and oxygen. OSA endotype-directed treatment appears to be a means to identify the right treatment for the right patient, which may have greater effectiveness compared to the same treatment for all individuals.

Study Aims: The goal of this study is to determine if a precision medicine approach, endotype-directed treatment, is more effective than a one-size fits all treatment approach (ato-oxy) for OSA in people with Down syndrome. Specific aims of the study include: Aim 1: To compare the effectiveness of ato-oxy therapy versus precision medicine (endotype-directed) treatment for OSA in people with Down syndrome over 12 months; Aim 2: To compare the effectiveness of ato-oxy versus precision medicine (endotype-directed) treatment approach for key patient-centered outcomes (PCOs), including health-related quality of life, behavior and cognition over 12 months; Aim #3: To compare the adverse effects of ato-oxy versus precision medicine (endotype-directed) treatment.

Study Description: This is a randomized clinical trial comparing ato-oxy versus endotype-directed treatment for OSA in children and adults with DS. We will enroll 200 participants with Down syndrome and OSA (100 children age 6-17 years, 100 adults age 18+ years). Participants will be recruited from five clinical sites from across the country as well as via outreach. Participants will be randomized 1:1 at an individual level to either ato-oxy or endotype-directed treatment, which would be either oxygen or ato-oxy dependent upon the individual’s OSA endotype. The study primary outcome is obstructive apnea-hypopnea index, the primary measure of OSA severity. Secondary study outcomes include measures of HRQOL, behavior, cognition and adverse effects. Participants will receive treatment and be followed for a total of 12 months during the study.