Patients and Families Improving Safety in Hospitals by Actively Reporting Experiences

Description

After piloting the intervention in one inpatient unit, marked improvements in family safety reporting and reductions in disparities in reporting by parent education and language results. The investigators now propose to conduct an RCT of the intervention in 4 geographically, ethnically, and linguistically diverse hospitals. The specific aims are to: (1) evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention in improving error detection and other safety outcomes, (2) assess the impact of the intervention on disparities in reporting, and (3) understand contextual factors contributing to successful implementation of the intervention. If effective, the intervention will contribute by: (1) increasing patient/family engagement in reporting, especially from vulnerable groups, (2) identifying otherwise unrecognized events, and (3) enabling hospitals to better understand safety problems in a 360-degree manner and design more effective, patient-centered solutions. Our application has high potential to reshape paradigms for measuring and improving safety and equity.

Hypothesis 1A: The I-SHARE arm will detect higher rates of errors (via I-SHARE tool + VIR) than usual care (via VIR alone).

Hypothesis 1B: In the I-SHARE arm, rates of errors detected by the I-SHARE tool will exceed rates detected through VIR.

Hypothesis 1C: The I-SHARE arm will have higher safety experience, safety climate, and patient activation scores than usual care.

Hypothesis 2A: Among Spanish-speaking and less educated patients/families, the I-SHARE arm will detect higher rates of errors (via I-SHARE tool + VIR) than usual care (via VIR alone).

Hypothesis 2B: In the I-SHARE arm, Spanish-speaking and less educated patients/families will report equal rates of errors as English-speaking and more educated patients/families (via I-SHARE tool).